Some people think one should stay all their life in the same job, whereas others advocate changing jobs from time to time.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
As careers place essential parts in individual lives, therefore, there are many debatable arguments related to whether people should be loyal to only one job in a company or they should change their jobs frequently. In my opinion, I believe that both perspectives also have negative and positive effects, this depends on individual preferences.
Working only one job for the long term indeed offers stability in career and income, which is suitable for mature people. To be more specific, due to the loyalty that they paid for a company, these employees are likely to be considered to promote to higher positions. As a result, they could have constant and high incomes to afford their livelihoods and spend on hobbies. For example, my father who spends 20 years working in an international corporation, becoming an executive director which allows him to have enough resources to take care of my family. However, workers would lose interest in their jobs if they work only one job for a long time. According to scientific research, it shows that employees repeat the same working processes for years would slowly lose their enthusiasm in their jobs and find it tedious.
On one hand, switching job frequently provides people, especially youngers to have various experiences from several career paths. Being exposed to many environments, adolescents could learn the abilities to adapt to changes and new knowledge, as a result, they become more talented and energetic. For instance, students can learn to communicate with others while doing a bartender or organize works and handle people as a waiter in restaurants. On the other hand, changing jobs frequently could lower their credibilities among employers, so that it is hard to get promotions in certain careers. Because of this, unstable income is also another drawback, which causes adversities for the livelihoods of youngers.
Understand that, I think young people should switch jobs sometimes to have valuable experiences and build up relationships, which would be helpful for their later careers. Moreover, in that process, they would find which job is suitable for themselves to dedicate. By doing that, when being mature, they could spend their time and efforts on the only job that they love.
In conclusion, the aforementioned career paths also have benefits as well as drawbacks, but, I think a person should balance between two of these in certain periods of life to achieve success and happiness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20100502513 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80420020675 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4611942361 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.764705882 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3529411765 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234629357847 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800132905836 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648835306718 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135999400629 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453180710209 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.