Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As there are many traffic jams due to mass transportations, some people believe that governments should impose policies to relocate the population to cities instead of the outskirts. In my opinion, I do not agree with this perspective because it would cause adverse effects on society and the economy.
There are many rationales standing behind my point of view, the most significant of which relates to the degraded living standards. Since a massive population gathers in certain cities, it will lead to shortages of living space in residential areas. As a result, the prices of accommodations would increase and be unaffordable for every citizen. Moreover, this will broaden the wealth gap among social classes, which could easily cause unrest among society. Besides, air pollution caused by massive transportation could also impact public health and put burdens on the medical systems of these cities.
Furthermore, because the majority of people live in cities, the suburbs will be sparsely populated. Therefore, governments could not efficiently exploit the resources of these areas, which is wastage in management. Besides, having enormous people living in cities means more transportations, this not only could not reduce traffic problems but also make it becomes severe. Due to this, infrastructures such as roads, bridges need to be maintained frequently, which increases the expenditures of governments. Therefore, governments are likely to face financial deficits to spend on essential aspects.
In conclusion, due to the aforementioned, traffic problems should be addressed by alternative measurements, rather than forcing citizens to live in cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61904761905 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13649749372 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623015873016 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9270711372 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217580604042 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698170480044 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743641814099 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144168699139 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609672530391 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.