Some people think that organizations would benefit more from young managers than from older ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Managing authorities are the backbone of any business or organization. Old managers are likely to serve commendably with the help of their experience whereas new managers can also be handy with up to date knowledge. Whether experience of old managers outweigh the enthusiasm of young lads has sparked a heated debate. This essay will endorse the given statement.
Multifarious points are there to shore up my point of view. Firstly, young managers are usually current pass outs and holds the current knowledge of market which can be quite lucrative for any organisation. Secondly, young managers are considerably more passionate as compare to old manager which helps any company to boost up their business by great time.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, since technology has overtaken almost everything, managing jobs are more reliable on electronic devices which are more friendly with young manager than old one. To be specific, there were no computers in the past, so, old manager may not have that good command over the electronic devices as compare to the today's managers due to overwhelm use of such devices in today's educational system
Others have conflicting views. They believe that, experience is most significant to be a perfect manager whereas other electronic devices can be learnt in no time. According to them, experience undergo ample ups and downs which gives them enough strength to handle any situation better than anyone
To recapitulate, updated skills are the order of the managing job which are carried by young managers through there complex and long educational syllabus. Hence, young managers are highly recommended for managing jobs
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-29 | Vivek chovatiya | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | Vivek chovatiya | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | Vivek chovatiya | 81 | view |
- many countries spend too much money on training of a few individuals for international sports competition Some people believe that government should spend more in ordinary people instead Do you agree r disagree give your opinion and example 79
- Some people think that organizations would benefit more from young managers than from older ones To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- Some people think that governments must insist on preserving traditional appearance of old buildings undergoing renovation or redevelopment To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 82
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 62
- Many people believe that the gap between rich and poor is widening nowadays, because in the current economic situation the rich become richer while the poor become poorer. What are the problems this situation may cause? What measures can be taken to solve 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lso be handy with up to date knowledge. Whether experience of old managers outweigh the...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ost up their business by great time. Further emphasizing on my point of view, since ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... handle any situation better than anyone To recapitulate, updated skills are the ...
^^^
Line 6, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are highly recommended for managing jobs
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256055363322 0.247107183377 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.155709342561 0.155533422707 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.141868512111 0.0946595960268 150% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.0501214627716 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0242214532872 0.0437548338989 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110726643599 0.122226691241 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0415224913495 0.0403226058552 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74964020529 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0415224913495 0.0326793684256 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00692041522491 0.00163938923432 422% => OK
Determiners: 0.0692041522491 0.0861772015684 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0173010380623 0.021408717616 81% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0173010380623 0.011925033212 145% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1676.0 1933.35771543 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 316.048096192 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27715355805 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385767790262 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318352059925 0.28420135186 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209737827715 0.203846283523 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134831460674 0.137316102897 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74964020529 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.037074148 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 60.1538341802 60.7387585426 99% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 22.25 20.7743622355 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4810498661 49.517814964 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 127.492653851 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7743622355 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.814263465372 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 54.0852059925 49.1944974215 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.71014492754 1.69124875643 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129529313558 0.332605444948 39% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0961418131605 0.102741220458 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0710202997577 0.0668466124924 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.55745707688 0.534860350844 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166196711373 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575978682943 0.134430193775 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284350899145 0.0742795772207 38% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.21871945983 0.324371583561 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.109321571626 0.0638462369009 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850289502107 0.228012699653 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105697263488 0.058150111329 18% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.4468937876 77% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.