Some people think people working in creative arts should be financially supported by the government. Others think they should find financial support from other resources. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There is much lively debate about whether artists should be supported by the government in financial. However, others are holding different opinions. Personally, I believe that they have many different ways rather than require government support.
On the one hand, some people believe that there are many advantages if the artists would acquire financial support from the government. Firstly, such supporting will motivate the artist to focus on their creative arts working. In other words, many people have a financial problem before they getting famous, this financial aid will help them concentrate on art creation and eventually benefits society as a whole. Secondly, financial aid from the government may stimulate more people to choose an artistic subject which has increased opportunities to find more people who have talent in arts.
On the other hand, some people hold opposite opinions. They believe that anyone who works in the creative arts should be supported by his or her family, not the supporting from the government which most of the money is tax revenue from all the taxpayer. Besides, many people have acquired some part-time jobs to support their careers. In addition, in terms of financial aid to the artists maybe occur a worse result in the end. Because some artists may think that it was too easy to gain the opportunity in creative artwork, they will be unlikely to concentrate on creation. Therefore, if the artists really have a financial problem in some particular period, there are still some solutions would help them such as to sell the artwork or gain supporting from advertising company etc.
In conclusion, although government financial supporting will ease the burden of the creative arts workers, there are also some disadvantages faced in not only the artists themselves but also the society as a whole. In my opinion, there are many ways would help artists to achieve their financial problem not only support from the government.
- Some people think people working in creative arts should be financially supported by the government. Others think they should find financial support from other resources. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some people regard the increasing business and cultural contact between countries as a positive development. Others, however, feel these leading to loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- News media has become more influential in people's lives. Others believe it is a negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The bar chart below shows the money spent on consumer goods in different countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s. Personally, I believe that they have many different ways rather than require government sup...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22884012539 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65197832997 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498432601881 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9795846182 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9333333333 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40795865785 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142517630072 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540981091753 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254401979689 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078929429085 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.