There have been different views about the effects of marketing strategies on consumers. Some people hold that they bolster economic trading, while others assert that these prevalent employments seem to be ignored by customers. From my perspective, it seems to me that advertising still appears to have considerable influences on commercial exchange for reasons outlined below.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that numerous consumers nowadays have a tendency to pass over various forms of publication. Firstly, high frequency of advertisements on many platforms is likely to be the main reason for this phenomenon. To be specific, numerous websites today are commonly attached with advertising-oriented links and pop-ups, eclipsing the information and contents, which irritatingly interrupts online experience and are likely avoided by users. The second rationale involves customers being fed up with varied promoting methods utilized by companies. Apart from advertising programmes and posters, there have been many cases when individuals are called unexpectedly by tele-advertisers to introduce their goods at inappropriate moments.
However, I contend that advertisements still appear to be successful in generating sales, irrespective of their continuous growth and high-density appearances. The main reason is that consumer-oriented marketing in many businesses, from the food industry to the technological domain in particular, has a large-scale effect, owing to enthralling images. For example, it has been estimated that there will be at least hundreds of people interested in a product among millions of users encountering its compelling images, such as a happy moment with family, on commercial 30-second clips. The effect is even further exacerbated by the word of mouth since a good testimonial from an individual having experienced the item will likely attract others to try it out.
In conclusion, while people intentionally ignore advertisements due to their common appearances, it is true that marketing still massively succeeds in the economic chain.
- In the modern world many employees lack soft skills such as communication and working in teams What are the main causes of this problem What are the effects of lack of such skills 84
- Some people think that a person improves intellectual skills better when doing group activities To what extent do you agree Use specific details and examples to explain your view 11
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 83
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little What extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their goods at inappropriate moments. However, I contend that advertisements s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, so, still, while, apart from, at least, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80718954248 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40156521405 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643790849673 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9919491569 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.692307692 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0298126169871 0.244688304435 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0115288841935 0.084324248473 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.016251292754 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0224980048618 0.151304729494 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145631397029 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.