In this concurrent world, It is undoubtedly true that few people believe that planning future is wastage of time as some people concur that people should focus on the present. However, I quibble from them propound that it is good to think about future in present for better life.
Adequate evidences, are obtainable to substantiate the concept of good life in future. The top notch concreate reason is they will get good job, money and house to live. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is that you can get girl for marriage. To uphold my notion I would quote instance of for migrating to other countries for higher education you have to plan for future to achieve a successful life.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. The public in general tend to to distinguish that planning is waste of time and work on present. Which has multifarious reasons. To commence with some people deem that by that you can save time and also you can focus better in present life. Withal they also upholds the decision of your present life can be get changed also so that you have to be get prepared of that. To illustrate without thinking anything of future you can see that people don't get what they tend to have in life or the goals they want to achieve.
To cap it all, you can see that better future planning is very much needed for getting perfect life ahead. and also it gives them what they want to achieve in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o substantiate the concept of good life in future. The top notch concreate reason is they...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...the concept of good life in future. The top notch concreate reason is they will get good ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...y to others. The public in general tend to to distinguish that planning is waste of t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g is waste of time and work on present. Which has multifarious reasons. To commence w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'uphold'
Suggestion: uphold
...etter in present life. Withal they also upholds the decision of your present life can b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...thing of future you can see that people dont get what they tend to have in life or t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... needed for getting perfect life ahead. and also it gives them what they want to ac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51908396947 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2524905445 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519083969466 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.869220812 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5714285714 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318325980401 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109623081235 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117317307961 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212197712419 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140457342597 0.056905535591 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.