In our contemporary epoch, thanks to advancement of our knowledge, the level of personal personal and public health has impressively increased during the last decades. However, a principal question remains about the responsibility of governments about nutritions. Some groups opine that opting divers food for consumption is completely a personal decision, while others believe that governments should actively interfere in this field. I personally agree with the second argument because of various rationals.I will elaborate about that in this essay.
Firstly, it is crystal clear that personal and public health are tightly related to each other. For decreasing medical expenses and improving the level of health in society, it is essential to choose our diet obsessively. Because it directly impresses our soul and body and without an appropriate food program, it is farfetched to reach them.
It is evident that our food habits have a strong bonding with our traditions and beliefs. Japan is a telling example. This community, by benefiting from a huge amount of sea foods, could profit from longevity. On the other hand, by arriving multitude of junk food and pre-prepared products, our health is at risk, due to their high magnitude of saturated fats and salt.
Undoubtedly, rarely could individuals perfectly control everything ranging from high-quality products to well-prepared nutritions. It is the main duty of governments to control the quality of each product and attempt to educate the public about the advantages and disadvantages of different meals. Of course impose heavy levy on unhealthy food, have a significant effect on their prices and consequently dramatically diminish their consumption rates. For instance in Sweden, imposing high taxes on unbeneficial foods like chips and surgery items, have a drastic effect on their purchase and act like a deterrent for their consumption.
To recapitulate, I quite agree that législatives should supervise the quality of nutritions and impose some preventive laws to mitigate and limit use of unhealthy meals. Mutually a relentless attempt is required for rise the common knowledge about the importance of having a healthy diet to achieve a healthy society.
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food Others however think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: personal
...ancement of our knowledge, the level of personal personal and public health has impressively incr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 510, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...d argument because of various rationals.I will elaborate about that in this essay...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49127906977 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04193552775 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8351273406 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.117647059 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148608340587 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467992478633 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453050238339 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827784595514 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502750161451 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.