It is irrefutable to state that government is elected by the people for the welfare of the society. Law-makers should spend monetary resources on local transportation so that everyone can use it without paying any kind of charges. I agree with this statement to a large extent as traffic problems can be solved and factions pay tax to the higher authority.
To commence with, poor individuals can use the transport facility. If the local transport have lower fares then citizens can easily commute from one place to another. To exemplify, in Punjab, the government have provided the transport provision free of cost for women so they can travel conveniently. In addition to this, air pollution can be decreased. Since the residents will give more importance to public transportation, it will reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment. Resultantly, it will ameliorate the quality of air.
Moving further, traffic hurdles can be solved. Because inhabitants will give less preference to their private vehicles, the problem of traffic congestion will be mitigated. Eventually, the rate of accidents will decline. Furthermore, residents pay tax to the government. As higher taxes are paid by the natives, it is a responsibility of authority to solve people's menace. If the locals pay tax to the authority then why law-makers should not devote their funds to local transport system?
However, I may not overlook the othe side too, the higher authority have other fields to invest money. While devoting maximum income on public transport, government will not be able to give priorities to other sectors. As a result, it will burgeon the burden on authority. What is more, public transport will be overcrowded. When government provide amenities without any cost, it will allure more citizens toward it. To cite an example, in Punjab, the roadway buses are always full with ladies as they have free access to it.
To conclude, investing money on public transport is extremely mandatory. Although local transport will become overcrowded, yet impoverished masses can use the transport facility without any difficulty.
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 81
- Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 81
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 56
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...viduals can use the transport facility. If the local transport have lower fares th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, while, in addition, kind of, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28529411765 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93536337299 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0712227243 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1304347826 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7826086957 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284468178861 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795722181149 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631071510362 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1654966652 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454764679463 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.