Submitted by B1_Ai_N on Fri, 03/13/2020 - 03:18
In recent times, the extension of developed techniques is becoming apparent in The Third World. The multitude of individuals are of the opinion that such mechanisms as robots plays a vital role for humankind`s elevated prospect; nevertheless, there exist the abundance of general public holding the contrasting view in terms of its several adverse impacts on the society. this essay will discuss both judgements including my own position.
First of all, such a major reason which should be taken into consideration the fact that individuals having revealed robots may be able to make their lives more cosily. The lifetime is altering day by day with the rocketing rate of speed, and considering to this members of society who live in a hectic life prone to do ease their works. The technical mechanics, take for instance, are likely to allocate humans` to do list; consequently, through robots` assist mankind could live much more conveniently. For example: washing machines, dishwashers, robots which clean the house, and other all types of technicians can alleviate a share of growing concerns.
On the contrary, a plethora of country dwellers argue on this issue by stating that not only is it do a hazard, but also is it have detrimental influences on the community. The expenses, to illustrate, for purchasing, charging, alterations of devices provided that it breaks down improves its perils. Moreover, having reliance on robots the population`s habits tend to be involved in changing; thus, residents might live in a sedentary life , because robots will work instead of them. As a result, one of the urgent current handicap the overwhelming obesity rate may increase. Therefore, that`s why some people gravitate to this claim.
From the above-mentioned paragraphs, it can be inferred that although it has benefits, a numerous drawbacks exceed its advantages. I strongly believe that people have to do their deeds by themselves even ni ample time.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social and practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons and relevant examples from your own experience 11
- The graph shows information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 89
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children while others feel it should be purely optional Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph shows information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ertheless, there exist the abundance of general public holding the contrasting view in terms o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...several adverse impacts on the society. this essay will discuss both judgements incl...
^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eting rate of speed, and considering to this members of society who live in a hectic...
^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...residents might live in a sedentary life , because robots will work instead of the...
^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'drawback'?
Suggestion: drawback
...at although it has benefits, a numerous drawbacks exceed its advantages. I strongly belie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33021806854 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10552397437 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663551401869 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1797156608 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.214285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123872482385 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378193060135 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255901491177 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556897013381 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328545813014 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.