some people think that scientific research should be controlled and carried out by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many hold the view that governments should be responsible for scientific research. However, there is a body of opinion which claims that scientific research can be better controlled by private companies. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that governments can make scientific research succeed easily. Compared with private companies, the national authorities can provide the research with more funds, which can be applied to hire excellent scientists to take part in enormous research projects like space exploration. In addition, the research supported by governments is more beneficial to the public, serve the public rather than make profits. For example, weather satellites launched by governments can provide free weather information to the public, help them prepare for daily activities.
On the other hand, nonetheless, private research is more efficient as they are in small scale, so do not need to deal with much bureaucracy. Enterprises can find technical requirements from market quickly and give direct command to research. Furthermore, private companies’ research can reduce the financial stress on the government, which can invest money in other important areas, such environmental protection and education.
To summarize, there is no doubt that government controlled scientific research has more outcomes. At the same time, nevertheless, private companies’ scientific research is more efficient and reliefs the financial pressure of governments. In the final analysis, therefore, one can conclude that both ways are equally vital to promote the development of science.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that governments should be res...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, for example, in addition, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73705179283 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14617455188 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609561752988 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6503059994 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.769230769 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237105713504 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095496851591 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711342125461 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155822317202 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561356842905 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.