Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people's health. Do you agree or disagree?
A highly contentious issue today relates to whether stores are permitted to sell food and beverages that are harmful to health or not. Personally, I totally disagree with this opinion because these types of food are incredibly convenient and cost-effective.
First of all, it is widely assumed that junk food is effortless to prepare. One possible explanation for this is that since it is already processed, people who are always on the move only need to purchase it at shops and enjoy it, resulting in saving their precious time for increasing productivity and commuting. According to a recent report published in the Economic and Market magazine in Vietnam, the efficiency of businessmen in contributing to the input of companies has been boosted to nearly 30% by consuming fast food during lunch break. With all this taken into account, the speed with which junk food brings makes it appealing as there is no effort involved.
Another reason why I support the notion that processed food should not be banned is that they are inexpensive. A logical point to support this is that the prime ingredients to make unhealthy food can be mass-produced and these products can be created in a non-perishable form, leading to the optimal choice for low-income workers who have to struggle with making ends meet. Research data conducted by the Health and Life magazine suggests that thanks to fast food, the public could manage to solve the difficulties in terms of finance and dietary choices due to COVID-19 since the price of healthy food continues to remain much higher. That is why I agree that junk food is an economical solution for individuals, especially during hard times.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that stores and shops should be allowed to sell unhealthy food because of its convenience and cost-effectiveness. Given this situation, policymakers should ensure the reasonable public consumption of these products in order to prevent the massive use of everyone.
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- 2 A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for y 95
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people feel that the legal age at which people can marry should be at least 21 To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remains'.
Suggestion: remains
...OVID-19 since the price of healthy food continues to remain much higher. That is why I agree that j...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13271604938 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93468209784 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1776045939 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.583333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238994368159 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796153865168 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495977306161 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132976058201 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302399484723 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.