Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The incredibly high frequency of traffic accidents has become one of the most significant social issues to be tackle. Some experts argue that governments can enforce strict laws to regulate dangerous driving, while other people suggest that the modification of drivers’ test and the road designs might play a greater role in reducing traffic accidents. This essay will discuss that governments need to make use of both measures to solve the problem.
To begin with, it is undeniable that stricter traffic laws can make a huge difference due to the high price that drivers might pay for driving offences. It is not uncommon that people have to pay hundreds of dollars or even lose some points from their licenses in many countries when drivers break the traffic light or Overspeed rules on the road. Although for some rich people, the money that costs for driving offences can be neglected, the points for their licenses cannot be ignored because they will be ineligible to drive after losing certain points. In this case, it is effective to encourage drivers to keep safety in mind.
However, punishments can only prevent some traffic accidents and I believe stricter training lessons and more reasonable road designs need to be used to deal with other dangerous driving behaviours. According to statistics, more than half of the traffic accidents were caused by drivers with insufficient driving skills and experience, which can be acquired during training and practising. If the government can modify the training system for drivers’ license, for example, prolonging the provisional license, the number of tragedies on the road will drop dramatically. On the other hand, the safety standards for road designing need to be upgraded and make sure there are no blind areas where accidents could happen.
In conclusion, higher fees for driving offence can have some impact on decreasing traffic accidents and we also need
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 70
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage Others said there are better ways to stop them fr 79
- 5 The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- 7 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asing traffic accidents and we also need
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20192307692 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64775212304 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8895575488 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317652397669 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116121630339 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532693326455 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191503515651 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333593086895 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.