Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views concerning the most effective measures to enhance road safety. Many believe establishing harsh punitive measures would be the most successful solution to decrease the number of road violations, while others believe that there are better ways. In my view, all measures, including strict punishments, should be taken by authorities in order to ensure safe driving for the people.
On the one hand, raising punishments to higher levels can help prevent major road safety infringements such as drunk driving. These punishments can vary from high traffic fines, revoking traffic licenses to imprisonments. When punitive measures are signified, people can be more aware of the damage and the consequences that they would have to face should they try to violate the law. As a result, they will become more careful and pay more attention when traveling on the road. However, strict punishments might not be as effective when dealing with minor accidents or violations that are indeliberate, because people might think they are being treated unequally.
On the other hand, with smaller traffic accidents, other less severe measures may prove to be more effective. To begin with, a lot of people do not cause accidents intentionally, and a small fee to remind them will be able to prevent them from violating again. In addition, it is suggested that the population’s awareness on traffic laws is in positive correlation with road safety. Therefore, the governments can organize workshops and traffic training sessions for citizens, in order to raise their awareness on the correct ways to use their vehicles, as well as the importance of driving safely. Applied together with reasonable punitive measures, these solutions can help contribute to safer driving experiences for people.
In conclusion, I believe that setting forth harsh punishments can help improve road safety, but only if it is incorporated with other less severe measures. All aspects of road safety should be covered effectively in order to fully eradicate traffic accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why do young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 73
- Nowadays children watch a lot of TV and play video games However some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child s mental health To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37846153846 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86253746003 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0957984628 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.533333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342168154534 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112927858407 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469106483232 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213910194363 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282672675521 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.