There is no denying the fact in the modern era excessive burgeoning road traffic nowadays. Whereas, few masses understand if impose too stringent punishment for a driving offence. Therefore, demolition will be traffic accident as well as the boosting road safety. This essay intends to highlight both the approaches and my own opinion in related to the upcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with the advocate's favouring strict punishment have the following notion. First and foremost the most beneficial for masses, if the given of punishment for who crashing road regulation in these days time. Owing to the healing effect on others driving people, since they do follow the road regulation. Although, the trend of road transportation has more worthwhile, yet we can not neglect the awful effects of this trend. The more impose harsh the punishment, the more opportunities. For example, nowadays we can observe transport vehicle, due to majority of people life faster than past, so they are not attention on rode regulation. In spite of more transportation, the borrowed on road.
Furthermore, the proponents supporting road safety have equal arguments that if follow rule not only helps people to reduce the road accident, but also forge concentration power among the human. Therefore, it is more crucial for individual lives in existing time. Because, these days enough traffic congestion, which they do not choose of this regulation, they are facing more difficulties. Ergo, the vehicle is useful nowadays, it has a plethora of difficulties, which are faced by a human.
In conclusion, while punishments can help to prevent bad driving, I believe that other road
safety measures should also be introduced.
- The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 75
- The charts give information about world forest in six different regions 11
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 66
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... masses, if the given of punishment for who crashing road regulation in these days ...
^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t bad driving, I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduce...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38148148148 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95691280449 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.046342088 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303892623108 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863799190912 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448853148625 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15485857456 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313093869234 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.