Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is often said that students should study the discipline of food and its preparation. While I accept that it may take a little time for it, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
The negative implications of studying the science of food are often discussed in terms of three keys areas. Firstly, people often do not realise the purpose of scientific knowledge of food, exactly they find it more straightforward and attractive to taste food than to research about it. Secondly, when it comes to studying how to prepare food, students have already parents preparing meals for them, so they don’t care much. Lastly, people argue that students should focus on subjects for the college entrance exam, and food science sometimes does not relate to their major in the future.
However, I would favour the idea that the scientific knowledge of food will bring them many advantages. For example, it will provide an understanding of food components such as carbohydrates, proteins, fats and minerals, so that individuals can choose food suit body conditions regardless of if they suffer from obesity. Moreover, people can decide what kinds of food should consume more due to health benefits. One field of food science is microbiology which is essential to bring us information about the possibilities that our food contains toxic bacteria. In addition, learning food’s preparation will increase the prospect of becoming self-sufficient when students live apart from home.
In conclusion, I support that students should spend time studying food science as the base knowledge to ensure high quality and safety for themselves.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24809160305 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85643357175 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3127733565 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307591872619 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120723344935 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738935851712 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20494403196 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554310394518 0.056905535591 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.