Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is often debated whether students should focus on studying the science of food and its preparation or if their school time should be dedicated solely to learning important academic subjects. While some argue that academic subjects are crucial for students' future prospects, I firmly believe that studying the science of food and how to prepare it can greatly contribute to students' independence.

On one hand, it is undeniable that academic subjects taught in schools play a vital role in shaping students' future career opportunities. These subjects provide fundamental knowledge in various fields, such as creativity and critical thinking. For instance, proficiency in English or other foreign languages can enhance students' communication skills, which are highly advantageous in professions that require interaction, such as interviewers or hosts. Moreover, excelling in important subjects can significantly impact students' ability to secure excellent grades, which are often prerequisites for job applications.

On the other hand, the science of food is widely recognized as an essential skill that fosters students' independence. By acquiring knowledge on how to prepare meals properly, students can ensure they maintain a nutritious and balanced diet, which is crucial for sustaining their energy levels during long hours of work or study. For example, they can prepare nutritious meals using a variety of foods, including vegetables and fruits that are rich in vitamins, promoting good health. Additionally, by cooking their own meals, students can save money that would otherwise be spent on dining out or paying extra fees and tips at restaurants. This, in turn, allows them to lead healthier lifestyles.

In conclusion, while learning important academic subjects undoubtedly benefits students' future prospects, it is equally important to provide comprehensive education on the science of food and its preparation. This knowledge equips students with the essential skills needed to achieve independence in their daily lives.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73684210526 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02928915718 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582236842105 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0161749833 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.153846154 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276456899763 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948492623792 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941029986256 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181894491583 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114646825956 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.