In contemporary society, tourism has indeed become a major industry in many countries, contributing significantly to their national income. While some believe that this growth in tourism creates new job opportunities for local people, others think that it endangers the natural environment, especially wildlife habitats. This essay seeks to discuss the impact of tourism in relation to its advantages and disadvantages.
On one hand, tourists require services such as transportation, accommodation, and food and beverages. Therefore, local residents can boost the local economy through providing cuisine or renting out their houses, which can enhance their quality of life. This is exemplified by large companies that offer services to tourists to ensure they have an unforgettable experience in the landscape. This can lead to more business opportunities and cultural collaborations in the long term, fostering the development of the national economy and investing in the improvement of both the landscapes and service quality. As a result, residents can earn a living by working for such organizations as tour guides with well-paid salaries. Furthermore, the development of tourism also helps local people showcase their traditions and cultures. For example, tourists visit Bat Trang village, which is traditionally renowned for its pottery-making, to buy souvenirs or experience how to make pottery. Therefore, the workshop's owner can promote its tradition and culture through handicrafts to tourists from all over the world.
However, mass tourism can have a detrimental impact on the environment. Overcrowding, pollution, and the construction of tourism infrastructure can harm fragile ecosystems and damage natural beauty. Travelers often use private vehicles, such as cars and motorcycles, which has a noticeable impact on the environment as these vehicles emit gases and fumes, causing pollution. This negatively affects animals, particularly endangered species that live in such polluted environments, leading to lung diseases and the risk of wildlife habitats becoming extinct. In addition, not only do animals suffer, but people also face challenges. Popular tourist destinations struggle to cope with the strain on their infrastructure, leading to issues like traffic congestion. If these issues are not addressed, they could result in an increase in accidents, causing people to suffer the loss of their loved ones, which is the most devastating consequence.
From my perspective, I firmly believe that the disadvantages of tourism outweigh its advantages because the well-being of both wildlife and people is of utmost importance compared to any benefits that tourism brings.
In conclusion, the growth of tourism has made a substantial contribution to the economic development of a country and the quality of local life. However, it is undeniable that the disadvantages it causes significantly affect both human beings and wildlife. Therefore, it is essential for people to raise awareness of tourism's impact and take measures to protect the environment.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- More and more students choose to go to another country for their higher education Do you think the benefits outweigh the problems associated with it 84
- Nowadays tourism has developed and contributed a significant portion of national income to its own country Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this development and give your opinion 78
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2624.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72925764192 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25455852297 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565502183406 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 506.74238477 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5480667894 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192074736108 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558588622768 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629141872195 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124615808494 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623572133717 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 78.4519038076 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2624.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72925764192 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25455852297 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565502183406 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 506.74238477 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5480667894 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192074736108 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558588622768 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629141872195 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124615808494 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623572133717 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 78.4519038076 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.