Some people think that studying the past does not teach us anything about the life today, while others think that history gives us valuable information about life today. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Learning about the past can be valuable information in this present day depends on which perspective we are looking at. As the scientists, archeologists, and historians could be beneficial to know about the past in order to improve and develop on modern society. However, some other people whose fields are not relevant to history, medicine or ancient study, can be seem the past as useless information. Even though the historical information seem useless, in my perspective the past is important because it can be the root for everyday's decision making process.
It depends on the occupation and the interest of people, the value for the historical data is useful or useless. People who are dealing with the past information such as historians, archeologists and scientists found the information as useful since they can use such information to discover about the root of humanism. Furthermore, they can develop medicines, technologies or any other fields of research to improve the standard of living by using of such information.
In contrast to this, not everyone can use of such information and believe the past information is useful in present life. Majority of people are occupying or having an interest in non-scientific or non-historic fields. Therefore, they could believe that the past does not hold any values. In fact, the past information does not influence in daily lifestyles. For example, knowing about the past would not influence on the everyday's decision making. Therefore, knowing the past would not be relevant to live in daily lifestyles.
In my perspective, every decision making process can be based on the past information. For instance, people would know how to secure their finances when there is the economic downturn. This can be possible because people have learnt from the past experiences. Like this, the more people learnt from the past, they will not make the same mistake as their ancestors or predecessors.
In conclusion, the historic information can be valuable information for some specific relevant working fields. However, majority of people are not working in those relative fields. Despite those information can be seen as a useless, the duplicate mistakes can be prevented by learning from the past.
- One long distance of planes consumes more than a car and it can pollute environment more than cars. Therefore the unnecessary flight such as tourist travelling should be discouraged than limit the car use. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The maps show the changed of Woodwards University spatial during 1985 until now. 84
- Some people think children in secondary school should study international news as part of the curriculum. Other think that this would be a waste of time as there are already too many subject for children to concentrate on. Discuss both view and give your 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The pie chart below shows the methods of booked for English courses by international students in three different countries in 2009 and in 2010. 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ble because people have learnt from the past experiences. Like this, the more people learnt from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...rking in those relative fields. Despite those information can be seen as a useless, the duplicate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23631840796 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.149253731343 0.155533422707 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101990049751 0.0946595960268 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0348258706468 0.0501214627716 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0273631840796 0.0437548338989 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134328358209 0.122226691241 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0398009950249 0.0403226058552 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95652526907 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0199004975124 0.0326793684256 61% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106965174129 0.0861772015684 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0422885572139 0.021408717616 198% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0124378109453 0.011925033212 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2248.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 360.0 316.048096192 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24444444444 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383333333333 0.374742101984 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322222222222 0.28420135186 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241666666667 0.203846283523 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141666666667 0.137316102897 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95652526907 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.037074148 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447222222222 0.56093040696 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.9350621503 60.7387585426 76% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.7743622355 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5556073597 49.517814964 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 127.492653851 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7743622355 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.65 0.814263465372 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 50.2222222222 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.94117647059 1.69124875643 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253950345468 0.332605444948 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.15536079359 0.102741220458 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0944107449365 0.0668466124924 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57624628575 0.534860350844 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111773385795 0.148594505496 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11432650047 0.134430193775 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460184239559 0.0742795772207 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403290849312 0.324371583561 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0404355254146 0.0638462369009 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178710136831 0.228012699653 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320979781131 0.058150111329 55% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.4468937876 163% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.