Some people think that studying the past does not teach us anything about the life today, while others think that history gives us valuable information about life today. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Learning about the history can be valuable information in this present day depends on which perception we are looking at. As the scientists, archeologists, and historians could be beneficial to know about the past in order to improve and develop on modern society. However, some other people whose fields are not relevant to history, medicine or ancient study, can believe that the history information is not relevant. Even though the historical information seem useless, in my perspective the past is important because it can be the root for everyday's decision making process.
It depends on the occupation and the interest of people, the value for the historical data is useful or useless. People who are dealing with the past information such as historians, archeologists and scientists found the information as useful since they can use such information to discover about the root of humanism. Furthermore, they have been developing medicines, technologies or any other fields of research to improve the standard of living by using of such information.
In contrast to this, not everyone can use of such information and believe the past information is useful in present life. Majority of people are occupying or having an interest in non-scientific or non-historic fields. In fact, the past information does not influence in daily lifestyles. For example, knowing about the past would not influence on the everyday's decision making. Therefore, knowing the past would not be relevant in daily lifestyles.
In my perspective, every decision making process are based on the past information. For instance, people would know how to secure their finances when there is the economic downturn. This can be possible because people have learnt from the past experiences, so that people will not make the same mistake as their ancestors or predecessors.
In conclusion, the historic information can be valuable information for some specific relevant working fields. However, majority of people are not working in those relative fields. Despite those information can be seen as a useless, the duplicate mistakes can be prevented by learning from the past.
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the Sun. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagram. 61
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 73
- Many people choose to live alone. What do you think the advantages of living alone are and do they outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an England town in 2012 50
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ble because people have learnt from the past experiences, so that people will not make the same ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...rking in those relative fields. Despite those information can be seen as a useless, the duplicate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246031746032 0.247107183377 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.148148148148 0.155533422707 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10582010582 0.0946595960268 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0343915343915 0.0501214627716 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0238095238095 0.0437548338989 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140211640212 0.122226691241 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0449735449735 0.0403226058552 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00615717634 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0185185185185 0.0326793684256 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.100529100529 0.0861772015684 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037037037037 0.021408717616 173% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0132275132275 0.011925033212 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2152.0 1933.35771543 111% => OK
No of words: 340.0 316.048096192 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.32941176471 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402941176471 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.341176470588 0.28420135186 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.258823529412 0.203846283523 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152941176471 0.137316102897 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00615717634 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.037074148 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.56093040696 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.930870196 60.7387585426 79% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8888888889 20.7743622355 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6887139103 49.517814964 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 127.492653851 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7743622355 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.814263465372 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 53.0065359477 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.08974358974 1.69124875643 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2596701778 0.332605444948 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142062215069 0.102741220458 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0919820282618 0.0668466124924 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.574306608884 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.107365681508 0.148594505496 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115425428354 0.134430193775 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480590135549 0.0742795772207 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.370102205326 0.324371583561 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0477904432054 0.0638462369009 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181184121402 0.228012699653 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343385256868 0.058150111329 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.