Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion

It is often debated whether the measure of a person's intelligence solely relies on their level of success. However, I firmly believe that there are numerous alternative methods to assess intellectual capability.

On one hand, success can be considered a significant factor in evaluating a person's intelligence. It is true that achieving goals requires quick-wittedness and problem-solving skills. For example, successful entrepreneurs from diverse backgrounds share the common ability to learn from their challenges. Without intelligence, they would struggle to identify problems and lack the necessary tools to overcome them. Hence, one can argue that measuring intelligence through success is valid.

On the other hand, there exist various alternative approaches to gauge intelligence beyond success. Nikola Tesla serves as a compelling example. Despite not attaining considerable worldly success, Tesla was renowned as one of the greatest inventors of the 20th century. His intellectual brilliance is evident through his groundbreaking inventions, which were ahead of their time and continue to be studied today. It would be fallacious to dismiss Tesla's intelligence based on his lack of conventional success. Therefore, I contend that intelligence cannot be solely equated with success.

In conclusion, while success can be one method to assess intelligence, it is not the sole determinant. Any attempt to measure intelligence through a single criterion would oversimplify this complex and controversial topic.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... often debated whether the measure of a persons intelligence solely relies on their lev...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ed a significant factor in evaluating a persons intelligence. It is true that achieving...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 221.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89592760181 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36299869795 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628959276018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7894712532 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.8666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7333333333 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261153483512 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874659048073 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758286022656 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157934011979 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251880491917 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.