Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion

It is true that the success of one person can be considered as a measurement of their intelligence. However, I am of the opinion that there are numerous other methods to evaluate a person’s intellectual ability.

On the one hand, success can certainly be a crucial factor in deciding how smart a person is. If a person is not quick-witted, they are not likely to achieve any goals in their lives. For instance, regardless of their ages, sexes, and cultural backgrounds, successful entrepreneurs around the world all have one common thing, which is the ability to learn through their problems. If they are not intelligent, they are likely not to discover the problem at first, and even if they discover it, they would not have the suitable tools to resolve it. Thus, intelligence can be measured by how successful a person is.

On the other hand, there are many alternative methods to measure intelligence instead of success. Perhaps the best example of this would be Nikola Tesla, who was a famous inventor in the 20th century. Although he was considered one of the greatest minds of his time, he had never achieved any great success and had to live a miserable life with a limited income for his inventions. Despite the fact that he had never achieved success, we can not say that Tesla is not intelligent since his inventions were ahead of time and are still being studied by later generations to this day. I would argue that how intelligent a person is has no relationship with how successful a person is.

In conclusion, success is only one of many methods to evaluate the intelligence of a person. Any ideas of measuring it will only be an absurd attempt to try to answer a controversial topic.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76094276094 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86144974782 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6273003449 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243185732384 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103768760789 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883385464596 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160725046855 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349072810458 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76094276094 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86144974782 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6273003449 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243185732384 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103768760789 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883385464596 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160725046855 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349072810458 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.