A group of people suppose that the domestic authorities should implement stringent obligations about the amount of noise produced by a person due to the interference and distraction it causes to surrounding people. Personally, I believe that this kind of law could bring both benefits and drawbacks, but the benefits seem to eclipse the disadvantages.
On the positive side, imposing strict policy on making noise might rapidly decrease the noise pollution at schools and workplaces, which then leverages the working and studying outcomes. That said, the decrease of intrusive sound made by a person means that the increase of sound quality and the more concentration another person might get to complete their tasks precisely. As a result, this person not only boost their productivity but also their working or studying quality which benefits himself as well as his organisation.
On the other side, another group of people may find it is extremely unreasonable because this policy can deprive them of freedom of speech. They will claim that they are constituting to the whole society, so making some noise is nothing serious or harmful, therefore, a fining fee level is unreliable. In other circumstances, the authorities could exploit the laws to profiteer from the obligation. For instance, in Vietnam, there is a law that fine noisy people in public places and that money can be a lucrative income for some of the Vietnamese security forces.
In conclusion, a severe policy about annoying people with noise might upgrade the studying and working environment but possibly enrage a group of people if it is not implemented approximately. Personally, I believe that the benefits can outweigh the downside if the authorities raise general awareness and apply the laws appropriately and properly.
- The dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects person who is being accused of the crime some lawyears have suggested that this practise should be changed an
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business distrcit 73
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hat money can be a lucrative income for some of the Vietnamese security forces. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29616724739 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97166177642 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557491289199 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.9040102776 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.181818182 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21508975126 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743890268505 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490312729164 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121689475739 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397567038638 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.