Some people think that there will be decrease in international travel in future Do you think the less amount of international travel is a positive or negative development

It is true that international travel is enhancing at a pace rate which is quite beneficial for both developed and developing nations. Some people opine that put restrictions on travel will be more advantageous for nations. I believe that it is largely a negative development, as majority of the individuals acquire those things which is possible only with having tourism.
There are various reasons why I think lessen travel to another countries brings more disadvantages. The main loss one of them would be to the local economy. Mostly tourists spend their money on buying souvenirs, staying in hotels and buy food and drinks etc. Also, they like to travel on historical places and need a tourist guide to solve their queries. Now the demand of construction workers is increasing to build roads, hotels and airports to attract more tourists from another provinces which helps to generate employment for the people. So, this decision will be unfair for the economy of the country and for youth too who would lose their jobs because of that.
Last but not least, visitors from outside bring innovative ideas and unique ways of doing things to the locals. As a result, people may learn something new from them. Similarly, visitors also learn the language, culture and traditions of the host country. It helps to create the peace and prosperity among different nations.
On the other hand, the decline of tourism would be useful in case of diseases such as corona virus, swine flu brought in with tourists would be reduce. Another benefit of reduced travel would be to the natural environment, which can seriously threatened by visitors.
To sum up, international travel has both pros and cons. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, restriction on travel would effect the tourism. That is why I think it is largely a negative development.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other benefit of reduced travel would be to the natural environment, which can se...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... Therefore, restriction on travel would effect the tourism. That is why I think it is ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, i think, such as, as a result, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07491856678 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74441517653 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.195589367 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245481621187 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703732548535 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688572822777 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135089241408 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818680501011 0.056905535591 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.