Some people think they have the right to use as much freshwater as they want, while others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think they have the right to use as much freshwater as they want, while others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Recently, the qeustion of freshwater has become a fiercely controversial issue. Some people assert that people are entitled to consume as much freshwater as they want, while others argue that governments should prevent citizens from excessively using freshwater. Personally, I believe both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.

On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that governments in some emerging countries, such as China and India, should control the consumption of freshwater. An obvious reason is that these countries do not have enough freshwater and they have a multitude of citizens. Furthermore, less-developed countries economy revolves around the industry, which requires to consume a huge amount of water, since they can not afford to spend vast sums of money on cutting-edge technology that can contribute to a decrease in consumption of freshwater.

On the other hand, it seems short- sighted to contend that all countries around the world should restrict the use of freshwater. Perhaps the most oft-cited argument against such a view is that governments of some developed nations located in Europe do not need to hinder people from utilizing freshwater because these nations have a great deal of freshwater. In addition, these countries impose vast sums of tax on freshwater. Thus, citizens often have a tendency to save freshwater as much as they can. To exemplify, the population of Norway was approximately 6.5 million in 2018. However, according to an ariticle released by the New York Times, the amount of freshwater in this country is more than that of China. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.

In conclusion, there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-20 idid382002 78 view
2019-09-06 hunanmail 73 view
Essays by user idid382002 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consuming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: consuming
...ves around the industry, which requires to consume a huge amount of water, since they can ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted argument against such a view is that governments of some developed nations lo...
^^
Line 13, column 105, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22257053292 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92550901574 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567398119122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9071885971 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321231948562 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908376296251 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927913300022 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184634090004 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123204305594 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.