Some people think universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. Others believe that this is an unacceptable policy.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a debate that has been on-going on how many male and female students should be accepted by the universities. Many believes that keeping an equal number of seats for girls and boys is a good idea, however some people believe that this is not a good policy. Although I agree with the idea to keep reservations for female students, I also believe that keeping equal numbers of seats in every subject would not be an effective educational strategy.
First of all, in my opinion we need to break down the admission problem that most of the universities are facing these days. All educational institutes have limited seats that are approved by the government. Due to this, the admission in these universities are based on merits. For example, in my university, they accept the students with criteria like minimum percentage & subjects that are studied previously. Let us assumed that if university add one more creterion that they will accept equal numbers of female & male, then there is a high chance that more qualified male student would not get an admission but some females will. This happens due to unequal gender ratio in my country. Currently we have 4:10 ratio for women vs men. In this case, there are two possible problems: 1. University will not get students as per the merit. 2. Many qualified students will not get an admission just because of their gender.
On the other hand, we are required to know the individuals' interest in the particular subjects. In my experience, many girls are intereted in courses like fashion modeling, sewing & clothes designing, airhosting, dietry and nuetritional subjects, etc. In contrast, many boys are intereted in mechanical, civil engineering, construction & field related sujects. If the equal seats criterion has been imposed then there are chances that universities will end up with empty seats for some of the subjects that we have discussed above.
Nowadays many universities have a policy where they have some limited positions reserved for female. This is mainly to overcome the issues like gender inequality & to support the women empowerment. Instead of offering specific number of seats, many institutes offers different types of scholorship specifically to females.
In conclusion, I really support the idea to keep some seats or addition support for female students but by keeping 50-50 acceptance ratio, we may end up with doing unjustice to some deserving candidates. Therefore, it is not realistic point to add into any universities' policies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
There is a debate that has been on-going on how many male and female students sh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'seats'' or 'seat's'?
Suggestion: seats'; seat's
...n & field related sujects. If the equal seats criterion has been imposed then there a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...sities will end up with empty seats for some of the subjects that we have discussed above. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of scholorship specifically to females. In conclusion, I really support the idea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1487804878 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80749261908 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529268292683 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7132479807 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9545454545 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292511474571 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757920650867 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062842510653 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148661435584 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080776064498 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.