Some people think that we can use as much fresh water as we want. Others think that fresh water supply should be controlled strictly by governments as the sources are limited. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Water is the most common liquid found on earth. While most part of our planet is covered with water, fresh water that can be used for drinking, cooking and other activities is quite less. Despite the aforementioned fact, some people still give themselves the right to use fresh water in an unrestricted way. Others oppose that it is necessary for the authorities to strictly control the amount of water usage. From my perspective, I side the latter opinion; however, this essay will still discuss both points of view.
Although it is certain that humanities will have enough fresh water for at least the next 100 years, but still, it is a limited resource. If people freely allow themselves to use clean water even in an extravagant way, it is obviously that they will put their next generations under a risk of having no fresh water to use. Otherwise, I agree that water resource should be accessible for every one’s needs, especially for agriculture and industries, they all need a large supply of water for producing. However, there should be a consideration in using water for any purposes. They can take simple actions to consume it more efficiently, like turning off taps whenever they are brushing or shaving, and finding opportunities to conserve water in their home.
The main purpose of controlling the water usage after all is to ensure that there are no knock-on effects on our next generations and there is always available water for everybody. So, in my opinion, the government plays an important role in raising awareness and encouraging a revelation in public. They can educate their citizens of how vital is our action today can effect on the future or basically, passing water-saving ordinances.
In conclusion, no one can deny the importance of water, especially fresh water in our daily lives. Individual responsibility as well as the government’s role should be considered to conserve water resource. Otherwise, water still can be accessible to everyone’s needs, but not for waste.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | phuongnguyen01 | 92 | view |
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some cities, there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings, and owners can decide on the styles of their houses.Do the advantages of this outweigh its drawbacks? 78
- the chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 the table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compaired with 2015 84
- Some people think that we can use as much fresh water as we want Others think that fresh water supply should be controlled strictly by governments as the sources are limited Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are playedalone.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unrestricted way" with adverb for "unrestricted"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...themselves the right to use fresh water in an unrestricted way. Others oppose that it is necessary for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an extravagant way" with adverb for "extravagant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...llow themselves to use clean water even in an extravagant way, it is obviously that they will put the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, well, while, after all, at least, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09309309309 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93581597036 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570570570571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0210393887 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336189504082 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124629361749 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507342329457 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224295591653 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707967267379 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.