Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A number of individuals assume that young people ought to be allowed to pick their work while others think that they should be sensible and ponder their future. I will talk about both perspectives and offer my viewpoint.
On one hand, the one who choose their future job freely seem to be more satisfied with their job, therefore they can imcrease their efficiency more than those who choose their job sensibly.
For example, a small test conducted by the students from Havard shows that those who choose their job due to their preference tend to do it better than those who not. They also have a wider range of choice and can be more creative. Sadly, these people tend to overlooked and misjudged their true abillities or experiences. Without a sensible look about their future, they seem to choose a career that they like rather than what can help them earn a living.
On the other hand, those who are more sensible and spend time consider their future seem to have more unpleasant experience while working. The result of that is a significant downfall in efficiency and consistency. They also work because they have to due do not have a wide range of job selection. However this group of individuals tends to have more realistic look about life and themselves so they understand their abilities better.
In conclusion, I find those who can choose their job freely appear to be more satisfied which is a good sign for recent and upcoming years.However this group needs to be more sensible and realistic about their job in order not to fail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...not have a wide range of job selection. However this group of individuals tends to have...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...good sign for recent and upcoming years.However this group needs to be more sensible an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...good sign for recent and upcoming years.However this group needs to be more sensible an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77323420074 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48272037161 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509293680297 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4771775791 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362500903012 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135126361974 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105602404969 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236635620672 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912295260035 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.