In today’s world, private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
These days, most logical examinations are financed and done by private ventures rather than the overseeing bodies. As I would see it, the advantages of this are more noteworthy than its downsides.
From one viewpoint, that exploration is paid and directed by privately owned businesses can be extraordinarily valuable. Truth be told, not normal for administrative associations, most organizations' essential destinations are benefits, so their inspiration to limit the expenses emerging upon research exercises is substantially more impressive. Subsequently, they will in general forestall their researchers and different specialists all the more carefully from squandering any assets, including time and cash; therefore, their results can be speedier and more cash proficient. Moreover, when the public authority leaves logical examination for organizations, the monetary tension on the public financial plan can be halfway diminished. All things considered, it tends to be dispensed for putting resources into other significant areas like training or transportation.
Then again, I accept that allowing private organizations to support or embrace such examinations will achieve more critical burdens. To begin with, there are not very many privately owned businesses that will accomplish neglected work while bearing an enormous monetary weight simultaneously. Therefore, they may require people in general to pay to access or share their examination results, so they can bear to cover their costs just as to guarantee their own salaries. Second, when permitting organizations to do logical exploration, the specialists can barely ensure the whole examination measure is under management. It is conceivable that organizations with the main concern being augmenting benefits will offer their examination to different associations, like psychological militants or crooks, who exploit such exploration to hurt society.
All in all, I guarantee that private interest in and direct of logical exploration may bring about a few preferences which are, notwithstanding, exceeded by the bothersome outcomes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, while, as to, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9375 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3745559239 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641447368421 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7838992623 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.846153846 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107534420168 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417041236979 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362981602688 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732703527446 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502627136118 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.