Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a raising concern about the role of zoos whether they are unethical cages or safe places to protect wildlife species. While I tend towards the former view, I must support the latter one. In the scope of this essay, merits of both views are thoroughly discussed.
On the one hand, it is admitted that capturing wild animals in a completely different environment from their own habitats may leave certain detrimental impacts on them. First aspect that should be taken into consideration is the decrease in instinct behaviours. After a long period of time in zoos, being constantly provided with food and other needs, animals will eventually lose the ability of hunting. Thus, if they are released to their initial environment, they might face higher chance of isolation and starving. It is prevalent when a tiger which was born in zoos without the care of his mother and his peers, he is likely to be isolated when he was sent back to the jungle due to the lack of communication ability and hunting skills. Another aspect is that human beings do not have the right to put any species into prisons and doing this may trigger serious anxiety among these miserable creatures. It has become far more normal to see animals acting like robots with routine activities in zoos which is the signal for anxious and stress to entertain people instead of living the natural lives. For these reason, advocate for the ban of zoos do have their own point.
On the other hand, to some extent, having wild animals in zoos is an effective way to protect them especially who are in the endangered list. Firstly, animals in wild environment have to face with numerous threats including the lack of food due to climate change, predators and even natural disasters. In this sense, the steady provision of zoos can be seen from an opposite angle. With the help of a thousand experts in their fields and specialized equipments, wild animals will be able to receive proper care to develop and grow. Secondly, albeit some zoos may use animals as money-making tools, we still have a considerable number of zoos where they have done their best to construct environments which are as similar to the real habitats as possible and tried to teach their animals necessary skills before releasing. In this way, the risks mentioned above might be significant mitigated.
In conclusion, irrespectively to the immoral element of zoos, I believe that the benefit of them can overweight the drawbacks and they should be indispensable places to preserve wildlife animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | tran ngoc lam | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | AnCourses | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | linh.king | 73 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of poliicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- When a new town is planned, it is more important to develop public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time in. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- The increase in the production of consumer goods result in damage to natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 89
- Fossil fuels (coal,oil or natural gas) are the main sources in many countries. However,in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 89
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...se in instinct behaviours. After a long period of time in zoos, being constantly provided with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... places to preserve wildlife animals.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 431.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9535962877 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62249749721 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573085846868 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1522413296 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.611111111 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247870895796 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733562506795 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411595845917 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144349737741 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027627096102 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.