Some people want academic subjects such as history and physics to be taught at secondary school. Others want practical skills such as mechanical and gardening to be taught. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are some different views about what should be included in the high-school curriculum. This raises the question of whether academic subjects including history and physics should be taught or practical skills like mechanical or gardening. From my point of view both of them are beneficial and essential for pupils.
Some people argue that it is necessary for children to learn academic subjects at secondary school. For those who tend to earn a degree from university, having an appropriate background knowledge in academic subjects are required. Physics, for instance, is one of the core subjects that should be taught to everyone at high-school if they want to take a degree in engineering majors like mechanical engineering, civil engineering , and so on. Moreover, there are some other subjects which offer them a wide perspective view about what happened in the past to the nations, governments and cultures.
However, beside the ideas mentioned above, others have different points of view. They believe that academic subjects can be taught to one who want continue their studies, at universities rather than schools. As most children take a gap year after ending up their high-school, practical skills like mechanical and gardening can be much more imperative for them.Furthermore, practical knowledge can bring them a lot of job opportunities in future, since some professions like gardening and landscaping need more practical skills than theoretical knowledge.
To sum up, in my opinion both academic subjects and practical skills should be taught to children with a reasonable
balance, because they need both of them for a successful future.
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 73
- Some people want academic subjects such as history and physics to be taught at secondary school Others want practical skills such as mechanical and gardening to be taught Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people want academic subjects such as history and physics to be taught at secondary school. Others want practical skills such as mechanical and gardening to be taught. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...the high-school curriculum. This raises the question of whether academic subjects including history and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...echanical engineering, civil engineering , and so on. Moreover, there are some oth...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ng can be much more imperative for them.Furthermore, practical knowledge can bring them a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n bring them a lot of job opportunities in future, since some professions like gardening ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40769230769 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98399305619 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2799039595 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.818181818 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392240718485 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151242615302 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780011995341 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218504201757 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960383417929 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.