Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets; however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both sides and give your opinio

Essay topics:

Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets; however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

In this industrialized era, there are those who hold the belief that the expenditure of the searches for other lives in space is a wastage. Meanwhile, the others agree that the government should spend the public budget on immediate solutions for global problems.

On the one hand, it is believed that the governments should make moves toward resolving these drawbacks as soon as possible. In clarification, climate change is becoming an alarming global issue. As a result, it is obvious that the fauna of the Earth is gradually lose their accommodation and this leads to the serious ecology imbalance. For example, the calving of the icebergs and glaciers in both Arctic and Antarctic is determined as the main cause of the death of numerous polar bears. Thus, the administration should take action in order to assist the animals in saving their shelters. Moreover there are still varied people having to suffer from diseases, poverty and natural disasters. Therefore, it is necessary for the governments to spend more money on medical treatment, food supply, better education and more job opportunities.

In parallel, the alien projects should also be conducted as a long-term solution for the global demands. In detail, it can be seen that the depletion of natural fossil fuel is considered to be an urgent question. For instance, the oil is predicted to be run out in the near future. As a consequence, the adverse effect of oil depletion will include the degradation of transport sector, the barriers in manufacture and so on. Hence, finding out new lives may be a new hope for us to handle this obstacle.

To conclude, it is undeniable that the governments should highly focus on dealing with these recent global disadvantages. However, the long-term strategy for the human desire also needs to be concerned by exploring an replaced provision in other planets. In my perspective, I strongly advocate the balance of the finance distribution in both these fields.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by user Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lost'.
Suggestion: lost
...hat the fauna of the Earth is gradually lose their accommodation and this leads to t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...t the animals in saving their shelters. Moreover there are still varied people having to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...also needs to be concerned by exploring an replaced provision in other planets. In...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1049382716 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92750126888 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6632436789 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2941176471 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249534881388 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659276003728 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571848783122 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142984235538 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363721757449 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.