Some people who have been in prison become a good citizen later. Some believe that having these people give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing crimes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Crime education has been of top priority in virtually every country’s agenda. It is argued by some people that educating the students by delivering speech with ex-prisoners should be held at school as the most effective approach to inform them of the hazards of conducting criminal acts. While this argument can be justified to some extent, I hold a belief that there offers many possible alternatives of crime prevention.
On the one hand, I believe that having ex-inmates warning children and teenagers about the negative consequences of breaking the law plays an important role in educational system. This is because those who have first-hand experience in committing a crime absolutely are the real examples of being suffered from ripple effects by their unlawful activities, which can raise public awareness of the dangers of crimes. It can be illustrated by a series of educational programs on Vietnam Television. In which the students would have valuable chance to receive the share of offenders about detrimental impact on physical and mental health’s prisoners such as being inhibited personal freedom, lacking contact with family and relatives or being marginalized after discharging from prison which may lead to the lost life opportunities. Therefore, the teaching method by having rehabilitated people talking to students is beneficial for them.
On the other hands, I am convinced that there are more efficacious ways to prevent crimes than a former prisoner hold a talk. Primarily, the parents should become pioneers in educating children about the danger of engaging in crimes, since the home environment has been exerting a profound effect on the general awareness of adolescents. Moreover, the criminology should be taught at school as an obligatory subject so that students can have chance to get significant knowledge about crimes. Due to that, they will gain a clearer perception of how to avoid the criminal activities. Thus, it is clear that the combination of the family and educators is more efficient measure to protect the young from illegal acts.
In conclusion, although the crime education by the ex-inmate’s sharing is advantageous for school students, I think there are more effectual methods to educate students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | Buithilanphuong | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | Buithilanphuong | 67 | view |
- some people who have been in prison become a good citizen later. Some believe that having these people give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing crimes. 67
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- fast food restaurants are becoming more popular than ever all over the world What are the possible causes and effects of this phenomenon 73
- Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences. Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion. 78
- Some people who have been in prison become a good citizen later. Some believe that having these people give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble alternatives of crime prevention. On the one hand, I believe that having e...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
...is is because those who have first-hand experience in committing a crime absolutely are th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to students is beneficial for them. On the other hands, I am convinced that ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... protect the young from illegal acts. In conclusion, although the crime educat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38309859155 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03586444395 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602816901408 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4767203106 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227740894831 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729077888031 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599482657341 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122348023383 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628152713039 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.