Whether one would be better off dedicating his whole working life to one organization or go from one to another continues to be a topical debate. Pondering both sides of the argument, personally, I tend to adhere to the second view.
Examining the first side of the debate, one could assume that there are significant benefits to not switching one's company. Firstly, it provides the employee with higher chances of getting a promotion or raise. Moreover, it lowers the risk of being deployed as organizations, in general, tend to trust and value their old workers more. It is also worth noticing that not only finding a new organization to hire services to is a stressful situation, but also integrating into new work environments is a relatively time-consuming and challenging process.
Turning to the other side of the argument, there are, as well, plausible reasons for an individual to agree with the opposing view. To begin with, altering work environment, making new bonds, and engaging in new interactions has been proven to be of use when a person intends to seek new opportunities, broaden his insights, pick up new skills and attain more experience. This may even more or less contribute to the person's self-growth and personal development. Another benefit, estemmed from such approach is empowering the person's curriculum vitae which may boost his chances of finding better positions. Moreover, a number of studies indicate that altering one's workplace remedies boredom and minor cases of depression.
In conclusion, there are pros to both views, regarding whether one must be dedicated to one organization during his whole working life or not. Considering all aspects, I, personally support altering work environment once in a while, as it provides more psychological benefits and makes a person's CV more impressive.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 95
- This chart below shows the percentage of the city's population that does not have any sort of health insurance. there is information from 1981 to 2005 for two cities 78
- Task 1 writing - Women employed in four countries 73
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e significant benefits to not switching ones company. Firstly, it provides the emplo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ed from such approach is empowering the persons curriculum vitae which may boost his ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...umber of studies indicate that altering ones workplace remedies boredom and minor ca...
^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...s more psychological benefits and makes a persons CV more impressive.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, in general, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23050847458 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.031679901 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9146462057 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139453949611 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457195917645 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039860611325 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934884650526 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341362490357 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.