The presented graph supplies the viewer with comparative data about how 3 types of sweet nutrients, including honey, fruit, and cane sugar alter the acid level in the consumer's mouth within a time span of 40 minutes. As delineated in the graph is acid levels below 5.5 cast detrimental effects on dental health by causing tooth decay.
At the onset within 5 minutes after consuming any of the three foods, the pH level of mouth hurriedly drops from its initial level which is 7. Among all three, cane sugar causes the most drastic change by dropping the pH level to 3.5. Mouth acidity level remains under the risk line during intervals of approximately 13, 20, and roughly 30 minutes for honey, fruit, and cane sugar, respectively. The mouth recovers its pH level faster after consuming honey compared to fruit or cane sugar.
To sum up, while all three kinds of sweets enumerated in the line graph are proven to cause a substantial collapse in the acidity level of mouth, thus generate tooth decay, the cane sugar has the most adverse effect by causing the most drastic and lasting changes in the acidity level of mouth.
- Once children start school, the teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than parents.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- Task 1 writing - Women employed in four countries 73
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (high acid levels are measured by low pH values).Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 95
- This chart below shows the percentage of the city's population that does not have any sort of health insurance. there is information from 1981 to 2005 for two cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mouth within a time span of 40 minutes. As delineated in the graph is acid levels ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
thus, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78461538462 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35249947511 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3318181662 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284072512104 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166860192163 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826611536871 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215751097325 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348388721212 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.