In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem?

Although there is a huge transition in agriculture from the conventional methods to a great extent of modernized measures, the crop yields have miserably failed to meet people`s demands. In my estimation, there is a number of fundamental causes and corresponding ways to solve this issue which merit rigorous scrutiny.

Admittedly, the root cause can be traced in the universal climate change during the last decades. This is perhaps tremendously influential, because it would put unprecedented strains on biodiversity, leading to the disturbance of ecological balance such as a decrease in fish stock and species loss. Dire consequences would be expected in the sight of such irreparable damages to the ecosystem. Likewise, the second plus point of this phenomenon stems from the natural disasters such as devastating floods and droughts, occurring in a regular basis. Equally, this fact seems quit defensible due to inevitable outcomes like crop failure, lack of productive soil and etc.

When dealing with the first problem, an effective way to work it out would be the promotion of renewable energy sources to reduce carbon footprints, hopefully making remarkable changes in the amount of greenhouse gases and global temperature which may be our best hope in the long-term. In reaction to the second issue, the most practical assistance to get into the root of the problem would be the strenuous efforts to cultivate clouds, preventive measures to diminish global warming and also building more dams to stop floods.

To draw a conclusion, to say that having the cutting-edge technologies will guarantee a significant boom in agricultural profits is rather a simplistic view. Indeed, embracing defence policies to tackle environmental problems as a priority to enhance yields which meet local food requirements, could be a viable proposition.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...e crop failure, lack of productive soil and etc. When dealing with the first problem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ailure, lack of productive soil and etc. When dealing with the first problem, an ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, may, second, so, such as, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43598615917 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13978331183 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671280276817 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7834803122 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.818181818 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133160606404 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445730424674 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0179184693969 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067638467272 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270038860396 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.