Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for the same organisations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some individuals prefer to work for the same organisation all through their entire career life while others are of the opinion that changing organisation is beneficial. This essay will outline the advantages the pros and cons of working for the same organisation through one's working life and also the advantages and disadvantages of switching jobs.
To begin with, some people prefer to work for the same organisation through their entire career life. There are two disadvantages of making this kind of decision. Firstly, such individual would not have the knowledge of how things are done else where, they would only be used to the mission and visions of the company they work for. Thereby, having limited understanding and knowledge of how things are done in other places and also won't be able to explore other options and challenge themselves in the career. Secondly, their counterpacts in other similar organisations might earn higher wages than they do. Likewise, prospects of been promoted to higher position might be limited. However, there are also pros of working for the same organisation. First of all, such individual will know the in and out of the company and will be confident doing their job. Therefore, giving them the assurance that they are doing the right things to keep the company going. Second of all, the employer will be satisfied with such individual interms of their loyalty to the company. Thereby, giving the employer confidence in the staff.
On the other hand,working for different organisation is believed by some people to be beneficial. To begin with, people will be able to explore and get more knowledge from working for different people. Moreover, there will be improvement in their skills which will be beneficial to them and increase their chances of getting employed due to their vast knowledge. Also, their is a chance of career progression and better salary structure. In addition, making them better off in the long run. Conversely, prospective employers will be of the belief that they are not reliable and can move on at anytime. Which will not be good for the organisation. Also, the individual might need to move house often because of easy access to work.
To Conclude, in as much as some people believe working for the same organisation all their working is great while others think it is better to work for different organisation. I am of the opinion that, people should change employment not too frequently to avoid making it a habit which could in turn be detrimental to their career life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , working
...dence in the staff. On the other hand,working for different organisation is believed ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng for different people. Moreover, there will be improvement in their skills whic...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...oyed due to their vast knowledge. Also, their is a chance of career progression and b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, kind of, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73514955274 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450471698113 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.200009409 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5217391304 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4347826087 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.60869565217 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432596609725 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143508514488 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161114128394 0.0667982634062 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353822125209 0.151304729494 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122424943804 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.