Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for differents organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people prefer to work for the same company throughout their working lives, others rather switch diverse firms and thus taste a different work experience and various approaches from other individuals. I strongly agree that changing work fields is essential for professional insights on different types of work tasks.
We must acknowledge that steady work position may be convenient, specifically in terms of permanent income and unchanging workplace for both professional and personal development. However, this might not be sufficient for enthusiastic workers who aim for new opportunities to grow as well as for working themselves up to higher positions. Consequently, they are not happy with the ever-lasting stereotype which awaits them. Moreover, working with the same people every day may lead to deepening relationships with other workers, though often disputes may occur as well.
Nevertheless, leaving a current job position can have a profitable impact in the long-run. Not only you will get rid of the stereotype but you also broaden your experience as well as expand personality views. Furthermore, continuing education in the work field provides new qualities and abilities which can be either challenging, exciting or practical and effective for further opportunities in other jobs. As a result, after the various experience you will gain, you can truly and objectively choose what kind of job suits you the best and is the most lucrative among all.
To conclude, choosing the process of working is the matter of personal taste. Although I believe that trying different job positions provides crucial abilities and experience, some people still prefer to work for the same organisation all their working life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-20 | verunenka68 | 84 | view |
| 2017-07-20 | verunenka68 | 78 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for differents organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Ecological balance is impossible to achieve when technological progress constantly ruins our environment. Do you agree? 73
- The graph below describes prices of housing in Sometown in 2005. 67
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for differents organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advanta 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, while, as for, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45555555556 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00331093016 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618518518519 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8199440894 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412711637366 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147153771497 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131897384266 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279387505025 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136405294253 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.