Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your opinion

Some humans operate for the equal organizations all their job life. Others think that is very good to employment for various organizations.

Majority of people likes to work the same organizations. And that is good idea. Because if people work the equal organizations, hi will find a lot of close friends and colleague. Also it is very good for his family. They only live in one place. But, other hand working in one please is very boring. It is hard to make new acquaintances and friends. Life remains the same. However, working in one place only can lead to higher levels in the work place.

I think people who like to adventure cannot work in one place. Because they always like to be on an adventure. And it is so much fun and exciting. Because by working in different places, you can go to different places, learn about the culture, traditions, customs and most importantly, learn a new language.

In other way, working in different places very difficult. It is very difficult to find a new job, a good and affordable place to live. And for married people, working in different places poses a big challenge for his family.

I also like working in different places. It is a pleasure to travel to difficult countries and make friends. And it creates a special feeling in a person. But working in different place can also be tiring. Working in one place is also boring. That is why I support both views.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d a lot of close friends and colleague. Also it is very good for his family. They on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to adventure cannot work in one place. Because they always like to be on an adventure....
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68148018825 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2060448462 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 48.75 106.682146367 46% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.4166666667 20.7667163134 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.45833333333 7.06120827912 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361279517401 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103751226124 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880232994623 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216998547073 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571268720482 0.056905535591 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.8 13.0946893788 44% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 50.2224549098 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.38 12.4159519038 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 9.78957915832 41% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.