Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both of these views and give your opinion

Nowadays many establishments that provide better comfort for their workers, because of spending more quality time and not to consider a new job. There may be various reasons for this, as everyone is a different world. So I will try to give reasons.
Some kind of people prefer to work in identical organizations. For the reason that, they are inclined to go the same place, or to sit similar chair of the room and the collagues recognizing themselves. In the other hand, they may love their working in the place that their first accepted location of job. There are other minds that who prefer to work in one place to advance their careers. And perhaps the work place is nearer to home for those who prefer.
Turning to the other side of the argument, some people percieve that the organization is supplying a high difficult level to their workers, or if there is no enough salary. As a result, they have to choose another good establishment to labour. On the other hand, some are tired of the monotony and are frustrated, as a result, he decides to work in the same profession or in a disserent job elsewhere. Chaging organizations have also good sides that people working for a various of companies are given more lucky chance to learn different skills. Such experienced and knowledgeable workers usually do not be in distress in life.
In conclusion, working long time in one place, provides financial benefits and job security, but in order to increase to higher careers, you need to have the work impact of different places.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nearer to home for those who prefer. Turning to the other side of the argumen...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usually do not be in distress in life. In conclusion, working long time in one ...
^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...financial benefits and job security, but in order to increase to higher careers, ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77528089888 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70364256528 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6102908615 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0714285714 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384978114452 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121799651697 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658771990837 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206188575455 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680577272989 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.