Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Derived from the current affairs of the labour group ages charts, it can be illustratively depicted that the labour market exceedingly elaborates its competition and defectiveness. Hence, provided that well-transforming life-expectancy is paving the growth for elders to perpetuate the working lifestyles, it is arguably stated the uprising trend might terminate the imbalance of labouring infrastructure. From my perspective, the plausible occurring scenarios will prove out as malicious for the society by virtue of the facts I will demonstrate as follows. Thus, I barely see eye to eye to the advantaged output of the scenarios.
On the first hand, gorging down onto the unemployment global issue, contemporarily disverting the youth, struggling under the fear of being out of job. Since the revoking of labour services for overaged groups is extended, more and more positions is under the brink of awfully paucity. Nevertheless, elders are not the feasible features who could uprise the potential impacts for any enterprises. they are, allegedley, not as scrupulous and industrious as young generations likely being. Therefore, it is not any idle threat to either firms' prospect or the sustainable growth for suitably aging majority.
As the ball rolls, there witness some aspects to make the case for this option. On the account of inevitably rocketing number of elderly workers, they are in acquisition to make ends meet, fulfill the monetary conditions. In essence, more and more elders suffering from desolation and ignorance of youngsters nowadays, culminating in the needs for commendably independable self-care. Subsequently, it is adequate that elders are eligible to straightforwardly engaging the collar market.
To sum up, I find this topic as eloquently debatable due to the pros and cons it might exert on the society by two means of juxtaposedly components: young and old generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 70 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | rumpul4skin | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | rumpul4skin | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 569, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'eye to'.
Suggestion: eye to
...emonstrate as follows Thus I barely see eye to eye to the advantaged output of the scenarios ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the advantaged output of the scenarios On the first hand gorging down onto the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nable growth for suitably aging majority As the ball rolls there witness some asp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ightforwardly engaging the collar market To sum up I find this topic as eloquentl...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly components young and old generations
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36054421769 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1662190876 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 294.0 20.2975951904 1448% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1576.0 106.682146367 1477% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 294.0 20.7667163134 1416% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 68.0 7.06120827912 963% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0572140860833 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572140860833 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0294288142664 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020658305447 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 150.8 13.0946893788 1152% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -235.39 50.2224549098 -469% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 119.1 11.3001002004 1054% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.29 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.54 8.58950901804 274% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 9.78957915832 623% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 119.6 10.1190380762 1182% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 120.0 10.7795591182 1113% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.