Some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage

The tight and busy schedule is the chief reason why students nowadays feel under pressure, and many of them decide to spend a year off in order to recover. There are various merits that a gap year brings to learners, but the drawbacks it includes is more than the benefits.
On one side, people frequently mention about gap year as a rewarding way to improve themselves due to these reasons. Firstly, this allows students to have time for relaxation, which they hardly ever have during their school time. In this period of time scholars may take on different activities that vary according to their hobbies; Moreover, they can also learn a novel skill that is beneficial to them. The purpose of this is to train themselves so that when they return to their work, they will be more superior than others and have well-paid job. Secondly, graduates are able to reset and shape their goals for an effective working in the following year. They can pay a visit around the world or in their countries to take photos of spectacular sceneries, or they can broaden their knowledge by exposing to a new culture.
On the other side, a gap year might hinder human development in some ways. Initially, such a year of doing nothing is detrimental to students who have no motivation to work and become inattentive. They can not catch up with their peers since not all of the citizens in the world have strong self-discipline, so it will be struggle for them to accomplish. Next, if learners want to have a gap year, they should ensure that they have no financial issue so that they can be afford for a year. This is the explanation for why some of the students who are not well-off cannot have a gap year, as they have to work for their living. Family background is also essential, for this will decide whether scholars have an effective gap year or not. Some parents do not support their children, and this cause a disagreement between them. Another problem of gap year is stress, which occurs when students see others working hard and earn money but they do nothing.
In conclusion, it is advantageous for students to take a gap year if they are able to pay for their living. However, the positive aspects of the trend mentioned above is outweighed by the negative ones.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The tight and busy schedule is the chief...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t includes is more than the benefits. On one side, people frequently mention a...
^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... have during their school time. In this period of time scholars may take on different activiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...they return to their work, they will be more superior than others and have well-paid job. Secondly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owledge by exposing to a new culture. On the other side, a gap year might hind...
^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...not catch up with their peers since not all of the citizens in the world have strong self-...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and earn money but they do nothing. In conclusion, it is advantageous for st...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55083809757 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7052960947 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250207549744 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950763178262 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554458962449 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156903606124 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054097910735 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.