Some students tend to play computer games rather than do sports. Why is this? What can be done to tackle the problem?
In the advent of technology, numerous innovations are emerging amid global competition. Inventions of modern gadgets, computer games and many more have engulfed the youngsters brain to a greater extent and pushed them away from any type of physical workout. Although, technical gadgets have gained tremendous importance in todays world, but students extreme dependency on its application for their leisure at the cost of their physical exercise can not be ignored. This essay will emphasize on various reasons behind this growing trend among children along with appropriate suggestions to overcome this issue.
First of all, continuous expansion of technological devices is extending its roots as a strong business. As a result, more and more indoor screen games are coming in market to adversely impact our young generation. Overindulgence in games with strong visual and sound effects deviates them to participate in any kind of physical sport. Moreover, it gives a feeling of comfort and relaxation along with enormous adventure to spend time on exploring these computer games rather than investing long hours on the ground doing physical exertion. For instance, nowadays, healthcare system is overwhelmed with obesity issues among children due to increased interest in technological gadgets. So, it is undeniable fact that comfort and excitement associated with present time computer games is making our students more lethargic to take part in any physical activities.
So, seeing the present scenario, it becomes a matter of great concern for everyone to find a suitable solution to overcome this problem. Some implementations that can be taken ahead involves contribution from parents who can play a vital role by limiting computer time to play games. Also, schools can encourage children in sports by assigning a compulsory period for physical education. In addition, educational bodies can arrange for an expert talk on the concerned topic to educate students about drawbacks of overuse of computer games and highlighting the value of sports in their life.
To conclude, technological developments are getting more popular in the world of youngsters. Connectivity of fun factor and adventure with these games are responsible for its demand in children's life. I think a collaborative approach towards given scenario can help in grappling the current situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-03 | mohd shaiq | 56 | view |
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc to serve society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
- The maps below provide information about an island in 1995 and 2005 59
- 85
- The line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004 89
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...able solution to overcome this problem. Some of the implementations that can be taken ahead...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e taken ahead involves contribution from parents who can play a vital role by lim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in addition, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5068119891 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96540149236 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607629427793 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4551999459 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.882352941 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244329408426 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06379827188 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055069296112 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133587547602 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728449494493 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...able solution to overcome this problem. Some of the implementations that can be taken ahead...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e taken ahead involves contribution from parents who can play a vital role by lim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in addition, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5068119891 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96540149236 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607629427793 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4551999459 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.882352941 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244329408426 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06379827188 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055069296112 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133587547602 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728449494493 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.