Some teachers think that international student exchange would be
beneficial for all teenage school students. Do you think that its advantages
would outweigh its disadvantages?
It is true that it would be a great opportunity for all teenage students to have an international exchange as it brings various benefits. While I accept that studying overseas can sometimes have a positive effect, I believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact.
On the one hand, there are some advantages to studying overseas. The most glaring virtue is that young students will have an opportunity to absorb new cultures from other nations. Take Vietnam Maritime highschool exchanging student programs, for example, these projects benefit teenagers as they give them an opportunity to experience different cultures. As a result, it will be a major improvement in students’ understanding of other countries; thus, their historical or geographical mark will be enhanced. Another clear benefit is that the intimacy level will be boosted not only for 2 cooperative schools but also for students from 2 different countries as they can expand their relationship with foreign learners.
Nevertheless, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Firstly, what should be factored in is that not all families are able to afford their children to study in foreign countries due to their financial condition. International studying exchange program requires a huge amount of fees which will be an obstacle for parents, especially poor families. As a result, it is not a priority for students to study overseas since the program does not necessary enough to help them become successful in the future. Secondly, it will be a problem, especially for immature students as they are not able to adapt to different lifestyles from other nations. Take European young students studying in Asia, for example, the time zone between two locations is different which is difficult to reset their sleeping habits. As a result, students may suffer from health issues related to their sleep like insomnia.
In conclusion, there appear to be limited benefits to having an international exchanging project, and I believe that the drawbacks outweigh these. It may be difficult to afford for some families as well as those suffering from health problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-19 | tiykuma | 92 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | ThaoNguyen_1 | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-19 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | yjjjj | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | yjjjj | 78 | view |
- Some people think the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22988505747 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91207526047 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3059912411 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248904456773 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926157959927 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06088070572 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165099122793 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173909196736 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.