Student exchange program is a type of educational program in which students from secondary schools, colleges or university study abroad at one of their partner organizations. Consequently, some educators suggest that broader international student exchange has a significant possibility of enhancing beneficial for all school teenagers. Despite there are some negative aspects, I think the advantages will surpass the disadvantages. In this essay, information and evidence are given to clarify my point of views.
Firstly, international student exchange program provides a chance of learning foreign languages and cultures in a different living environment. As the age of teenager is the most suitable age for learning new things, students may have a likelihood of exposing their hidden talents when changing to a totally new studying atmosphere. Moreover, the types of international student exchange program are both short-term and long-term. While short-term program focuses on languages skills and cultural activities which help children enrich their knowledge and social skills, the latter expects students to integrate themselves into the host family, immersing themselves in the local community and surroundings. Upon return to their home country, teenagers are expected to incorporate this knowledge into their daily lives. As a result, international student exchange program perform significant advantages of helping children to broaden their mind.
Secondly, while studying abroad for the first time, teenagers may have to face with cultural conflict and home-sick. However, with the development of the Internet, students and their family can easily communicate and support each other when necessary. Consequently, parents can help their children adapt the new environment quickly and feel assured even when parents are not around.
To conclude, basically international student exchange program succeeds in educating teenagers become more confident individuals with a wider perspective on life and international affairs. The government should take this program into consideration to improve the method of education.
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature 78
- It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible. You cannot have both together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- The rate of unemployment in some countries is high Because of this there is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level 64
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation's history.However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is to maintain old buildings? 89
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elping children to broaden their mind. Secondly, while studying abroad for the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97712418301 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09414311975 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7220689216 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.933333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213097045211 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782212648289 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750490891477 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132336772433 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808233698109 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.