Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online.
In recent times due to the epidemic crisis, universities are considering the best strategy for offering students the opportunity to enroll in them. Some believe that hosting courses online is the best way to move forward, while others strongly disagree. I personally believe that to decide, if this is a positive or negative development, we should consider its long-term benefits for students.
First and foremost, attending classes online is an economically friendly decision, since foreign students from different parts of the world would not be required to spend extra money on traveling and housing. All they need to do is to pay their tuition fees. Secondly, recent studies indicate that a person is more efficient, when he works in his natural environment, e.g. his home, and is not distracted by his surroundings. Thirdly, online learning seems to be the best approach to remain socially distanced and protect ourselves from spreading diseases.
On the other hand, many people believe that e-learning could never completely substitute the traditional ways of teaching. Especially in higher education the purpose is not only teaching. Education is the starting point for exchanging opinions and interacting with different people. In addition, some say that on-line studying does not offer the chance to students to network and find jobs after graduating, since they lose the opportunity to study on campus, meet their professions in person, and take job interviews. Although there is some truth to the above-mentioned considerations, this does not mean that offering classes online is a negative development.
In conclusion, I believe that studying online in terms of saving money and being more efficient is the best choice and should be encouraged as an alternative to the more traditional types of teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | thanhtu000 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 89
- Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom Do you agree with this statement What is an alternative to traditional face to face teaching 78
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely Others think this is a waste of financial resources Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9780194646 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4574778487 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196618077299 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587571019028 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508194634234 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106124169066 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437421054621 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.