Numerous sophomores desire to possess more grasp about other disciplines to enhance their main disciplines. Nevertheless, the rest are of the opinion that spending time and effort studying for on a qualification is more integral. While there are a large number of reason to concur with the latter idea, I would argue for the former perspective.
On the one hand, some students yearn to learn a particular subject because they want to focus on their techique, which will become an essential part in students’ future. When they spend timen concentrating on one field, they will have more practical knowledge and experiment, which do wonders for their vocations in following years. For instant, an apprentice designer, if this person only practices drawing apptitudes, they will possess a large number of neccessity prowesses for his career.
On the other hand, many pupils claim that more indespensable to learn more domains. Due to the fact, these freshman desire to possess a load of soft skills and a little of understaning about society. If schoolchidren own them, they can land a covetous job more easily. Because having these skills, these pupils have unchallenging interviews and satisfying from their employers. In this day and age, most enormous enterprises require these apptitudes more technical grasp. Therefore, owning a little knowledge of other disciplines and a main subject is more essential than only having grasp in a particular subject.
In conclusion, although concentrating on a discipline is necessary, spending time and attention having knowledge abouth other ones is more crucial.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 87
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work Others however believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes Suggest some solutions 61
- The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000 The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ation is more integral. While there are a large number of reason to concur with the latter idea, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... reason to concur with the latter idea, I would argue for the former perspective....
^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s drawing apptitudes, they will possess a large number of neccessity prowesses for his career. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36758893281 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96917143374 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6428172419 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.461538462 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293886597532 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102072550495 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062724006195 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168816898763 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405057130687 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.