In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Today, hunger is a controversial issue. There seems to be two main causes and a number of solution which we will be discuss here.
Regarding the roots of the problem, perhaps the major contributing factor to the issue is low income of individuals. People with low earnings can not afford to provide themselves with adequate amount of food. This is a clear link which can be observed in less affluent countries where the number of people suffering from hunger is greater than that for developed countries. Furthermore, climatic changes have also contributed to this problem. It goes without saying that these have led to warmer seasons and lower precipitation all around the world. Consequently, regardless of technological progress, food production has been faced with more severe obstacles which have resulted in less agricultural yield. Therefore, the accessibility of food has reduced, leading to hunger.
Turning to the possible solutions, governments should perhaps consider performing initiatives to boost their economies. That way, the average income would increase, meaning that more individuals would be able to buy sufficient amount of food. In addition, although taking measures to lessen global warming would appear to be necessary, since a global census seems to be awkward to be achieved in near future, agricultural adaption would seem to be more efficient. In other words, governments should perhaps invest in introducing genetically modified crops which are tolerant of hot weather and require less water. As a consequence, food production would be facilitated and become more economical.
To sum up, it would appear that hunger may largely stem from economic matters and global warming. Possibly, stimulating economic growth and adapting agricultural crops to the new conditions of today world, would help humanity to overcome hunger.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51916376307 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9401183294 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5701661117 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127320242179 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394432702342 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417892274555 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674488558797 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465608505608 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.