Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
What is the main objective of a government has been a debatable issue. It is believed that developing a country economically is the most important one while others disagree with it claiming that there are advances which are of equal importance. There are many argument supporting these views.
On the one hand those who support economic development refer to numerous advantages of the progress. Perhaps, the major benefit is the increase in average income of citizens which means that they will be able to consume more products or services. This will eventually lead to improving their living standards. Moreover, the government will have adequate budget to invest more in scientific and technological initiatives, for example discovering cures for cancer, which in turn, will result in the enhancement of life quality of people. In fact, when an economy progresses, unemployment rate declines meaning that the number of taxpayers rises. Therefore, the government's income grows enabling it to invest further in research programs.
On the other hand, critics of prioritizing economic aims argue that it is equally imperative that every government aim to progress in human rights enforcement. Firstly, to protect justice, they had better consider eradicating official corruption. Since in an officially corrupted economy, richer citizens can benefit unfairly from public services and plans through, for instance, bribery, justice will be damaged. Furthermore, providing individuals with the chance to flourish their capabilities is an objective that should be fulfilled by governments. In other words, promoting and developing educational systems means that more people will have access to education and more talents will be discovered and flourish. Consequently, this promotion tends to assist the community to progress more.
To sum up, I would tend to side with the opponents of the idea of economic progress. It is unreasonable to prioritize economic goals to human rights development such as defending justice and promoting education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...mber of taxpayers rises. Therefore, the governments income grows enabling it to invest furt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 607, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'systems'' or 'system's'?
Suggestion: systems'; system's
...s, promoting and developing educational systems means that more people will have access...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61093247588 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00437194144 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620578778135 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8210167815 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.647058824 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88235294118 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174533025968 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528992651655 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449208302141 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112874482604 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356957219039 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.