Famine has still been the greatest issue in many countries around the world despite the significant breakthroughs and advanced technologies applied in agricultural fields. Numerous reasons relating to social, political and environmental factors can be accounted for this disturbing phenomenon.
The first point to make is that political and ethnic conflicts are mainly to blame for the catastrophic starvation in many nations such as Sudan, Ethiopia or Venezuela. Over recent decades, people in African countries have been facing severe food shortages due to chronic conflicts between local ethnic groups and political parties. In spite of an enormous quantity of natural resources, Venezuelan people have still been starving because of the political crisis and this issue is still far from the end. Secondly, the agricultural innovations are seemingly no match for the environmental degradation caused by human activities. Floods, hurricanes and droughts are raging more frequently in Asian countries like the Philippines and Vietnam, posing threats to food security in many rural areas. Besides, overpopulation and diseases are also among the main reasons for the lack of food in the developing countries.
Since this problem is serious, tireless efforts must be made by governments and organizations all over the world. While food donations can temporarily ease people’s hunger, strategies for sustainable agricultural development are more likely to tackle food issues in the long run. Developed countries should be more obligated to help people in areas effected by natural disasters by providing food and agricultural technologies which help increase crop yield.
In conclusion, the scarcity of food has still been a global threat although many advanced technologies have been used in agricultural fields. Beside social factors, natural disasters are among principal reasons causing this phenomenon. Hence, all nations should be responsible for this issue by donating more food and having more effective solutions to diminish the repercussions of environmental problems.
- Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 90
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food,clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 78
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live a new country. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- More and more people are spending a large amount of money to make their appearance look younger Why do people want to look younger Do you think it will be bring positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ounted for this disturbing phenomenon. The first point to make is that politica...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79220779221 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06225807592 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1969386032 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202944701405 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731344946285 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607687865381 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143205075057 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425816716951 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.