It is widely acknowledged that verbal communication has more power than its written counterpart. While this opinion is valid to some extent, I believe that written communication is more effective on certain occasions.
It is understandable why some people support the idea that verbal transmission is a more powerful language than written conservation. The key rationale here is that when communicating by oral language, the speaker can transmit not only the information but also his or her tone, tempo, emotion,… which play important roles to convey the message more clearly, effectively. Meanwhile, without these things listeners can even misunderstand what speakers want to convey. For instance, students would more easily understand lessons when teachers describe them verbally, compared to reading books or notes. Therefore, it seems sensible that spoken conservation is more significant than written communication.
However reasonable the idea that oral transmission contributes a more powerful value than written communication, I am convinced that the latter is still preferable in some circumstances. For example, businesses always use documents and commitment signatures are the agreement for parties in order to ensure the respect and compliance, and these written documents can also be fresh evidence in court in case the parties break the commitments, because it is long-lasting and explicit. This is a testament to how delivering by writing is more significant in certain situations.
In conclusion, while it may be justifiable for the power of spoken conservation, I believe that communicating by writing is also superior on some occasions.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: mikeboss268
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...but also his or her tone, tempo, emotion,… which play important roles to convey th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3239962129 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8913532534 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.272727273 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31863253825 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129969280282 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929275004309 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210612504518 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995715188894 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.